måndag 5 augusti 2013
Swifts and swallows on the news
This weekend one of the Swedish National TV shows visited Susanne Åkesson and Anders Hedenström during their fieldwork on swifts and swallows on Öland. See the clip from "Rapport" (starting 16.00).
tisdag 30 juli 2013
Sydsvenskan about insect research!
Today Sydsvenskan reports on some of the CAnMove releated insect research going on at the moment. Read more about Mikkel, Maren and Lumbo!
söndag 14 juli 2013
New paper on 3D tracking!
Computer vision applications are very
useful to study animal movements, but due to their intrinsic complexity they
are challenging to design, implement, and use properly. In our new paper (see http://aslo.org/lomethods/free/2013/0278.html)
we describe a laboratory system for tracking zooplankton in 3D. We demonstrate
the crucial importance of using a correct calibration for proper interpretation
of animal swimming behaviour and why 2D tracks are unable to give complete
information on Daphnia movement
performance.
This new system is currently used to
investigate how zooplankton deal under multiple risks – such as UV radiation
and predation – and how individual difference in behavioural responses might
affect the functioning of aquatic ecosystems. More to come soon…
/Giuseppe et al.
torsdag 27 juni 2013
New paper on flight speeds of birds
When we wish to calculate how far a bird
can migrate given a certain fuel load, or how fast a bird is expected to fly in
a specific context (such as display, foraging or migratory flight), we often
make use of flight mechanical theory. The backbone of this theory is the
U-shaped relationship between power required to fly and the flight speed
through the air (airspeed). The theory was developed/adapted for bird flight
more than 40 years ago by the English scientist Colin Pennycuick. Over the
years Colin has amended the theory by various experiments and measurements,
often involving wind tunnels. Accurate predictions from this theory rely on a
number of parameters that describe the aerodynamic properties of the avian body
and the wings. Some of these parameters, the induced drag factor and the body
drag coefficient, have now been explored in the light of new measurements of
flight speeds using an ornithodolite. It turns out that birds are probably more
efficient in generating the lift than previously assumed, and also that the
body drag coefficient (describing how much drag the body is generating) may
vary among species.
The fieldwork for this study was carried out last autumn by CAnMove scientists together with Colin Pennycuick, who is at Bristol University, using a new ornithodolite consisting of a Vector range finder (a pairs of binoculars with a laser range finder), an anemometer for wind measurements and a computer for data recording. The fieldwork was carried out on the south east coast of Öland during the autumn migration period in 2012, where large numbers of a variety of species migrated. The paper is published in the Journal of Royal Society Interface, and is open access.
The fieldwork for this study was carried out last autumn by CAnMove scientists together with Colin Pennycuick, who is at Bristol University, using a new ornithodolite consisting of a Vector range finder (a pairs of binoculars with a laser range finder), an anemometer for wind measurements and a computer for data recording. The fieldwork was carried out on the south east coast of Öland during the autumn migration period in 2012, where large numbers of a variety of species migrated. The paper is published in the Journal of Royal Society Interface, and is open access.
/Anders Hedenström
torsdag 20 juni 2013
A foraging cost to migration in fish
Migration
is a phenomenally widespread behaviour in the animal kingdom. Yet even for
migratory species it is very common that not all individuals migrate within a
population (“partial migration”). What maintains these two very different
strategies (migrant and resident) in animal populations is still largely a
mystery, although recent work into partially migratory freshwater fish (the
roach) has shed some light on this fascinating problem.
Roach
migrate out of lakes in the winter into streams, returning in the spring. Or at
least some of them do, whilst others remain resident the whole year round in
the lake. A recent study showed that this migration may function as an
antipredator behaviour, with predation from voracious piscivorous birds
(cormorants) being significantly lower in the streams compared to the lake
during winter (see here). So if the benefits of migration are so
great, why don’t they all do it?
One reason
might be that migration can be costly. Roach migrate into streams that are most
likely food poor environments compared with the lake. In our study, published
in PLoS One (see here), we test this idea, and quantify a
foraging cost to migration in the roach. By assaying the gut contents of both
migratory and resident roach in Lake Søgård in
Denmark throughout the migratory season (in collaboration with our
buddies at the Danish Technical University), we found that migrants had less
food in their guts and also lower quality food items. Hence our data supports
the idea that migration involves ecological trade-offs between predation and
energy acquisition (the p/g model).
The
next puzzle is to ask why certain individuals adopt a migratory or resident
strategy. In fitness terms, are these strategies equivalent? Is the behaviour
genetically fixed or phenotypically plastic? We will keep you posted…
Tack!
//Ben
et al.
tisdag 18 juni 2013
Congratulations Rachel!
![]() |
| Zebra finch |
We are very happy for her success and wish her good luck with her research project!
torsdag 13 juni 2013
CAnMove database progress
| Tracking radar on the Ecology House, Lunds University |
If you have any questions or comments you’re welcome to contact me!
Mats Svensson
Prenumerera på:
Inlägg (Atom)


